QMCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NetApp has a net margin of -19.2% compared to Quantum's net margin of 18.03%. Quantum's return on equity of -- beat NetApp's return on equity of 121.65%.

Quantum has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -89.02%. On the other hand NetApp has an analysts' consensus of $138.88 which suggests that it could grow by 17.22%. Given that NetApp has higher upside potential than Quantum, analysts believe NetApp is more attractive than Quantum.

Quantum has a beta of 3.580, which suggesting that the stock is 257.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NetApp has a beta of 1.230, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.045%.

Quantum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NetApp offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Quantum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp pays out 42.19% of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quantum quarterly revenues are $70.5M, which are smaller than NetApp quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Quantum's net income of -$13.5M is lower than NetApp's net income of $299M. Notably, Quantum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NetApp's PE ratio is 21.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum is 0.76x versus 3.87x for NetApp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pure Storage has a net margin of -19.2% compared to Quantum's net margin of 7.66%. Quantum's return on equity of -- beat Pure Storage's return on equity of 9.75%.

Quantum has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -89.02%. On the other hand Pure Storage has an analysts' consensus of $71.78 which suggests that it could grow by 11.47%. Given that Pure Storage has higher upside potential than Quantum, analysts believe Pure Storage is more attractive than Quantum.

Quantum has a beta of 3.580, which suggesting that the stock is 257.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pure Storage has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.853%.

Quantum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pure Storage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pure Storage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quantum quarterly revenues are $70.5M, which are smaller than Pure Storage quarterly revenues of $831.1M. Quantum's net income of -$13.5M is lower than Pure Storage's net income of $63.6M. Notably, Quantum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pure Storage's PE ratio is 169.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum is 0.76x versus 7.36x for Pure Storage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rigetti Computing has a net margin of -19.2% compared to Quantum's net margin of -623.76%. Quantum's return on equity of -- beat Rigetti Computing's return on equity of -51.99%.

Quantum has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -89.02%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could fall by -62.84%. Given that Quantum has more downside risk than Rigetti Computing, analysts believe Rigetti Computing is more attractive than Quantum.

Quantum has a beta of 3.580, which suggesting that the stock is 257.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Quantum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quantum quarterly revenues are $70.5M, which are larger than Rigetti Computing quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Quantum's net income of -$13.5M is higher than Rigetti Computing's net income of -$14.8M. Notably, Quantum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rigetti Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum is 0.76x versus 129.19x for Rigetti Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Digital has a net margin of -19.2% compared to Quantum's net margin of 12.04%. Quantum's return on equity of -- beat Western Digital's return on equity of 3.4%.

Quantum has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -89.02%. On the other hand Western Digital has an analysts' consensus of $89.20 which suggests that it could grow by 48.03%. Given that Western Digital has higher upside potential than Quantum, analysts believe Western Digital is more attractive than Quantum.

Quantum has a beta of 3.580, which suggesting that the stock is 257.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Digital has a beta of 1.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.175%.

Quantum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Western Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Western Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quantum quarterly revenues are $70.5M, which are smaller than Western Digital quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Quantum's net income of -$13.5M is lower than Western Digital's net income of $493M. Notably, Quantum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Western Digital's PE ratio is 36.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum is 0.76x versus 1.42x for Western Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.